Home System Structure System Features Pricing About Us Contact Us
Employee Performance Appraisal Software, Performance Review Software, Web Based Performance Appraisals, Online Staff Appraisal, Employee Reviews, Web-Based Employee Evaluation, Staff Review, Employee Assessment
Web-Based Online Employee Performance Management Software Systems, Online Staff Performance Reviews and Appraisal Software Systems, Performance Evaluation Software Systems, Performance Reviews Online, Employee Online Assessment and Appraisal Software Systems
Client Login to Appraisal Smart   Performance Appraisal Software Systems (cont...)
Appraisal Smart covers more than the Performance Appraisal or Review - it covers Performance Management in substantial detail...
read more
The conducting of Performance Appraisals need not be so stressful any longer...
read more
Interested in becoming a Partner to market Appraisal Smart in your country?
Have a look at our Business Partner Plans...
click here
Client Technical Requirements
Download PDF Brochure

 

Employee Performance Management and
Appraisals Demystified


PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Definition

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT is a system and process that links the organization's goals and strategies to individual and team performance so as to increase organizational effectiveness.

It is a joint process that involves both the line manager and the employee who identify common goals/objectives, which correlate to the higher goals of the organization. This process results in the establishment of written performance expectations; later used as measures for feedback and performance appraisal (the latter is also known as performance review, assessment or evaluation).

Performance Management is about providing direction, clarity and support to the work that employees do so as to optimise their effectiveness and efficiency in line with the needs of the organization. It focuses both on objectives (the 'what') and on style and behaviors (the 'how'), so that it is possible to assess not only whether employees are achieving their individual objectives that have been set, but also whether their performance is in line with the organization's preferred values and culture, e.g. teamwork, customer focus, interpersonal relationships, participative management style, etc. (doing the RIGHT THINGS in the RIGHT WAY).

The model below illustrates the four stages of Performance Management:

Performance Management Model

This model is aligned with the WORK NEEDS of individual employees, which are as follows:

Expanded Performance Management Model

To provide for the above needs of an employee, let's consider what should happen at each stage of the Performance Management Cycle:

1. Planning Performance: Performance objectives for individual employees (at all levels) are jointly discussed and agreed during one-on-one, face-to-face meetings between jobholders and their immediate line managers - normally for a period of 12 months. (Similarly, objectives could be set for whole work teams, provided that the team members are totally interdependent, working towards achieving the same goal/output, i.e. each team member contributes a portion towards it).

2. Managing Performance: During this stage jobholders implement/execute the agreed objectives. They manage their own performance, assisted by their line managers who should remove performance obstacles in the work environment and provide the necessary resources, training and coaching. Line managers are also responsible for integrating and co-ordinating (horizontally and vertically) the objectives of all their employees/units/teams, monitoring and controlling their performance, taking corrective action, and doing joint problem solving as and when necessary. The leadership, feedback, reinforcement and support they need to provide them with throughout, are of utmost importance.

Managing Performance is an ongoing, 12 months' activity that actually runs through all the phases of the Performance Management Cycle. It is the golden thread of Performance Management.

3. Reviewing Performance: Times for formal Performance Reviews/Appraisals are decided by top management. Generally, 4 or 6-monthly formal perfomance appraisals are sufficient. During these sessions, jobholders and their direct line managers discuss (and assess) how well the agreed objectives have been achieved. Problem areas are identified and corrective measures planned, including possible training that the jobholder needs.

4. Rewarding Performance: The actual rating of performance (how well each objective had been achieved) forms part of the Performance Review sessions. Rewarding people for good performance takes the form of monetary rewards (performance-related pay such as bonuses and/or salary adjustments). However, the power of non-monetary rewards, such as praise and recognition, should not be ignored and needs to enjoy much more emphases than it generally does.

In practice, Planning Performance and Reviewing Performance can take place during one session, called the PERFORMANCE INTERVIEW.

previous page                                              next page

 

site map
Home | System Structure | System Features | About Us | Contact Us | 1-Minute Pitch | Pricing
Technical Requirements | Training Workshops | Business Partner Plans | Hosting | Free Downloads
Performance Management | Performance Appraisals | Performance Interviewing | User FAQs
360-Degree Feedback
| 360 Feedback FAQs | L&D Module | Clients | News | Links | Site Map
Email: info1@appraisal-smart.com | Contact Us
Copyright © 2004 - 2010 Appraisal Smart Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.